Enrollment in supported employment services for clients with a co-occurring disorder

Authors: 
Fuller, T. R., Oka, M., Otsuka, K., Yokoyama, N., Liberman, R. P., & Niwa, S.
Year Published: 
2011
Publication: 
Psychiatric Services
Volume: 
62
Number: 
5
Pages: 
545-547
Publisher: 
American Psychiatric Association
Background: 

People with serious psychiatric disorders often experience "co-occurring substance use disorders" (p. 545). Therefore, they require integrated services and employment offers "a meaningful activity that supports recovery" (p. 545).

Purpose: 

The study examined "the relationship between co-occurring disorders and enrollment in supported employment services among clients with serious mental illness" (p. 545).

Setting: 

The setting was Thresholds Psychiatric Rehabilitation Centers in Chicago Illinois.

Sample: 

The study sample included 1,748 clients who were admitted to Thresholds services between January 2008 and December 2009 (p. 545).

Data Collection: 

Data was retrieved from electronic medical records at Thresholds Psychiatric Rehabilitation Center in Chicago and analyzed for clients admitted during a 2-year period.

Intervention: 

The intervention was supported employment for people with chronic mental illness with co-occurring substance use disorders.

Control: 

The comparison condition was supported employment for people with chronic mental illness without substance use disorders.

Findings: 

Clients with a co-occurring substance use disorder were 52% less likely to enroll in a supported employment program. However, of those that did enter the program, the competitive employment outcomes for both groups was similar.

Conclusions: 

People with chronic mental illness and co-occurring substance use disorders are interested in competitive employment; however, they have difficulty accessing supported employment programs and are successful once they do.

URL: 
http://www.worksupport.com/kter/documents/pdf/EnrollmentinSupportedEmployment.pdf
Disabilities: 
NIDILRR Funded: 
Research Design: 
Peer Reviewed: 
Yes

Access to supported employment for consumers with criminal justice involvement

Authors: 
Frounfelker, R. L., Wilkniss, S. M., Bond, G. R., Devitt, T. S., & Drake, R. E.
Year Published: 
2010
Publication: 
Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal
Volume: 
34
Number: 
1
Pages: 
49-56
Publisher: 
American Psychological Association
Background: 

Compared to the general ex-offender population, individuals with SMI have higher rates of homelessness, unemployment, and greater reliance on public assistance. Given the additional challenges and needs of this subpopulation, it is critical that consumers have access to services found to be effective.

Purpose: 

This research aims to provide further understanding of the influence of severe mental illness (SMI) and criminal justice involvement (CJI) on access to Supported Employment (SE) services. The authors investigate differences between consumers with and without CJI regarding access to SE and explore reasons for group differences. This study employs a mixed-methods design. The quantitative portion compares employment service utilization of consumers with CJI to consumers without CJI to examine hypothesized differences in frequency of access and time to receipt of SE services. The qualitative portion includes in-depth, individual interviews with consumers with CJI and service providers to gain various perspectives on consumers' with CJI entry to SE.

Setting: 

This study examined access to SE among individuals with SMI and CJI receiving services at a community mental health agency.

Sample: 

A total of 1,191 individuals with SMI admitted to Thresholds between December 2007 and December 2008 were included in the quantitative portion of the study. A criterion for entry into Thresholds is an individual having a primary psychiatric diagnosis of a SMI such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or schizoaffective disorder. A total of 12 individuals were recruited for the qualitative portion of the study, four employment specialists, four mental health treatment team leaders, and four consumers with past or current CJI.

Data Collection: 

Descriptive statistics and chi-square analyses were used to compare group (CJI vs. without CJI) frequencies on demographics and SE service utilization variables.

Intervention: 

Thresholds provides a comprehensive array of treatment and rehabilitation services, including medication management, residential services, case management, and day programming. Currently, Thresholds has 22 employment specialists that assist consumers in obtaining and keeping jobs.

Control: 

There was not control or comparison condition.

Findings: 

Consumers with CJI take longer to access SE services. Consumers with CJI and service providers identify the following as barriers or facilitators to access to SE: competing challenges for consumers with CJI such as mental health probation, the adverse impact of CJI on consumers' psychosocial functioning, social networks, consumers' relationships with practitioners, and practitioners' relationship with SE.

Conclusions: 

Consumers with CJI do receive SE services at the same rate as those without CJI, but it takes them substantially longer to engage in SE services. Both programmatic and policy level interventions and modifications may ameliorate this problem.

URL: 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20615845
Disabilities: 
NIDILRR Funded: 
Research Design: 
Peer Reviewed: 
Yes

Providing effective employment supports for persons living with HIV: The KEEP project

Authors: 
Factors affecting vocational outcomes of people with chronic illness participating in a supported competitive open employment program in Hong Kong
Year Published: 
2005
Publication: 
Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation
Volume: 
22
Number: 
2
Pages: 
105-114
Publisher: 
IOS Press
Background: 

The Kirk Employment Empowerment Project (KEEP) was a three-year demonstration project funded by the Rehabilitation Services Administration (RSA) to test strategies for improving employment outcomes of individuals with HIV/AIDS. KEEP sought to identify and test service strategies that would be effective for individuals who have multiple barriers to employment, and individuals from populations that are typically underrepresented in HIV/AIDS research.

Purpose: 

The purposes of this article are to (1) describe the KEEP model and (2) provide data regarding program outcomes.

Setting: 

The study setting was the Horizon House, a treatment center for individuals with HIV/AIDS in Philadelphia, PA.

Sample: 

The study sample was 148 individuals who were referred to and accepted for KEEP services. The sample was predominantly African-American (72.3%) and male (60%). A substantial proportion had co-occurring disorders, with over a third report a psychiatric disorder.

Data Collection: 

Employment tracking data were collected for each participant upon job start, significant job changes, and job end. Initial baseline interviews were conducted by research staff with each participant to obtain demographic data and income, motivation to work and satisfaction with life issues in general as reflected by participants responses to quality of life items. Follow-up interviews were conducted at 6-month intervals for the duration of the project. Descriptive statistics were used to report outcomes for participants.

Intervention: 

The KEEP model emphasizes rapid attachment in the workforce and expecting participants to do as much for themselves as possible with support. Among the specific individualized services offered by ESC‚ were assessment and evaluation, job search assistance, benefits and legal counseling, disability management education, on-site job support (such as help negotiating with an employer), job-related problem-solving, specific skills training (such as learning to use public transportation), referral to auxiliary services, coordination and collaboration with other service providers, and other miscellaneous wrap-around services.

Control: 

The study used a pre/post intervention design without a control or comparison condition.

Findings: 

Of 148 participants in the project, 114 (77%) were employed at some point during the project. They held a total of 278 jobs during the project, averaging 2.4 jobs per participant. Sixty-three percent of participants were employed for 90 days or longer during the project, Earnings ranged from $2.50 per hour to $44.23 per hour, with an average hourly wage of $8.49 (median $7.50/hour). Of the 278 jobs, only 4 paid less than minimum wage. The vast majority of all jobs obtained (87.4%) did not include any benefits at any time.

Conclusions: 

The fact that they achieved such high employment rates in the KEEP project supports the evidence that for people with a variety of disabilities, a history of competitive employment, no matter how limited, can be considered an indicator for future employment success. Employment also contributed to improved health and physical functioning.

URL: 
http://content.iospress.com/articles/journal-of-vocational-rehabilitation/jvr00278
Disabilities: 
NIDILRR Funded: 
Research Design: 
Peer Reviewed: 
Yes

A randomized clinical trial of supported employment for inner-city patients with severe mental disorders

Authors: 
Dutta, A., Gervey R., Chan, E. F., Chou, C., & Ditchman, N.
Year Published: 
1999
Publication: 
Archives of General Psychiatry
Volume: 
56
Number: 
7
Pages: 
627-633
Publisher: 
American Medical Association
Background: 

One primary goal for people with psychiatric disabilities is competitive employment. However, the actual rate of employment is less than 15%. The authors hypothesize two reasons: individuals with psychiatric disorders are discouraged from seeking competitive employment because health professionals believe that "the stress of competitive work produces adverse effects" (p. 627), and once in the standard vocational system, people tend to stay in sheltered workshops instead of transitioning to competitive work.

Purpose: 

The purpose of this study was to replicate the New Hampshire study in Washington, D.C., with a more diverse and disadvantaged group of patients and a variety of vocational agencies.

Setting: 

"Community Connections, an agency in southeast Washington, DC that serves people with severe mental disorders who need intensive case management" (p. 628)

Sample: 

152 unemployed, inner-city patients with severe mental disorders

Data Collection: 

Interviews were used to gain information about demographics, employment histories, income sources and amounts, clinical symptoms and other relevant information at the beginning of the study and then at 6 month intervals for 24 months. A variety of employment data was gathered such as hours worked, wages, job duties, benefits. Psychiatric symptoms were assessed using the PANSS a semi structured rating scale.
Bivariate analysis were conducted to test for significant differences in study conditions. Two vocational outcome variables were computed for every month of the 24 month follow up period: competitive employment and work for 40 or more hours in a single month. The independent variable was the local unemployment rate for the geographic area surrounding each program. Some demographic and clinical covariates that should be included in multivariate models predicting employment were excluded due to their high correlation with other variables.
Unemployment rates over times were inspected for each of the seven states in which study sites were located. Then hierarchical random regression analysis using time varying and fixed covariates were used to determine the effect of unemployment rate on each of the two employment outcomes. Random effects logistic regression modeling, addressed issues found in longitudinal multi-site data such as missing observations, fixed versus time varying covariates and more.

Intervention: 

The intervention was the Individual Placement and Support (IPS) model of supported employment.

Control: 

The control group received Enhanced Vocational Rehabilitation (EVR)

Findings: 

During the 18-month study period, participants receiving IPS were more likely than those in EVR to obtain competitive employment. IPS participants "also had superior outcomes in other dimensions of competitive employment" (p. 629). In addition, IPS participants were more satisfied than their EVR counterparts.

Conclusions: 

IPS appears to be superior to EVR; however, a lack of evidence exists for the IPS model producing negative results in non-vocational areas, such as self-esteem and quality of life. In fact, the study validated an increase in those two areas, in both IPS and EVR. IPS increased the rate of competitive employment as compared to EVR.

URL: 
http://www.worksupport.com/kter/documents/pdf/RandomizedClinicalTrialofSupportedEmployment.pdf
Disabilities: 
NIDILRR Funded: 
Peer Reviewed: 
Yes

The future of supported employment for people with severe mental illness

Authors: 
Drake, R. E., McHugo, G. J., Bebout, R. R. Becker, D. R., Harris, M., Bond, G. R., & Quimby, E.
Year Published: 
2008
Publication: 
Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal
Volume: 
31
Number: 
4
Pages: 
367-376
Publisher: 
American Psychological Association
Background: 

People with psychiatric disabilities have been able to be competitively employed using supported employment. However, limits to supported employment include: not everyone with psychiatric disabilities wants to work; people are afraid of losing benefits; they lack confidence; they receive little reinforcement from their counselors; or they may not receive the help they need. In addition, finding competitive employment may be difficult due to employee illness, inadequate services, and fear of losing benefits.

Purpose: 

The article "reviews current research on innovative attempts to improve the dissemination and effectiveness of supported employment" (p. 367). The intent is to expand the success of supported employment.

Setting: 

This is a review of literature. The included studies were undertaken in various locations and settings.

Sample: 

he sample included published literature in MEDLINE, PubMed, PsychlNFO, and Scopus; currently funded grant titles, such as NIMH, NIDILRR, and the Social Security Administration. The researchers also discussed the current research with individual investigators.

Data Collection: 

Research was reviewed in each of the 9 areas identified in the Intervention section.

Intervention: 

The review suggests enhancing 9 areas to improve the success of supported employment: "(1) organization and financing of services, (2) disability policies, (3) program implementation and quality, (4) motivation, (5) job development, (6) illness-related barriers, (7) job supports, (8) career development, and (9) new populations" (p. 368).

Control: 

Control conditions varied across the studies. Conditions included Group skills training, enhanced vocational rehabilitation, psychosocial rehabilitation, diversified placement, train-place, sheltered workshop, brokered vocational rehabilitation, and traditional vocational services.

Findings: 

With regard to organization and financing of services, clinical and vocational services should be integrated at the client level, which would offer the client "single team of providers who provide a consistent message" (p. 368). Disability policies actually "socialize people into disability" rather than supporting them. Increasing the quality of vocational services will address several of the areas identified in the Intervention section, in addition to learning to implement, maintain, and update supported employment programs as research becomes available. Motivating people with psychiatric disabilities to work can be difficult, especially with the overwhelming issues they face, such as treatment itself, applying for benefits, obtaining insurance, or societal stigma. Job development is critical to supported employment; none of the approaches mentioned have been studied empirically. Individuals with greater symptoms are less likely to be employed unless vocational and psychiatric services are integrated.

Improving job supports would enhance the employability of the individual, such as increasing the use of natural supports and skills training. Career development implies a pattern of growth and increasing satisfaction in employment over time. And lastly, supported employment was proven as a successful technique in the field of developmental disabilities; it is being evaluated as a technique for use with populations other than those with psychiatric disabilities.

Conclusions: 

Supported employment is an evidence-based practice that needs improvement.

URL: 
http://www.worksupport.com/kter/documents/pdf/FutureofSupportedEmployment.pdf
Disabilities: 
NIDILRR Funded: 
Peer Reviewed: 
Yes

Predictors of successful return to work from HIV-related disability

Authors: 
Drake, R. E. & Bond, G. R.
Year Published: 
2004
Publication: 
Journal of HIV/AIDS and Social Services
Volume: 
3
Number: 
3
Pages: 
89-96
Publisher: 
Journal of HIV/AIDS and Social Services
Background: 

Many individuals with HIV/AIDS experience periods of unemployment as their physical symptoms increase. However, some in treatment do continue or return to employment.

Purpose: 

The purpose of this study was to compare a sample of individuals with HIV/AIDS who successfully return to employment and those that do not. The factors included disease-related factors and service-related factors.

Setting: 

The setting was an HIV/AIDS primary care clinic of a large, university-affiliated hospital.

Sample: 

The study sample consisted of 135 patients whose records indicated that they had successfully regained employment following disease-related job loss. A matched cohort of individuals with HIV/AIDS who had not regained employment was selected as a comparison group.

Data Collection: 

The data consisted of patient clinical records related to HIV/AIDS treatment and symptoms and services delivered. Statistical analyses consisted of descriptive statistics and analysis of variance (ANOVA).

Intervention: 

The majority of predictor variables were related to HIV/AIDS, such as CD4 cell count and length of time in treatment. However, the effects of one intervention were also included, the provision of mental health services.

Control: 

A matched comparison group was selected consisting of individuals with HIV/AIDS who had not returned to work following disease-related job loss.

Findings: 

Substance use disorders were more prevalent in those who had not achieved return to work. Those who had returned to work were more likely to have received mental health assessment and treatment.

Conclusions: 

Mental health services may serve as a gateway to return to work for many individuals with HIV/AIDS. In addition, identifying patients who are already being treated by the mental health team in order to assess their desire and ability to return to work is an important first step in increasing the effectiveness of a return to work program.

URL: 
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J187v03n03_07?journalCode=whiv20
Outcomes: 
NIDILRR Funded: 
Research Design: 
Peer Reviewed: 
Yes

A randomized controlled trial of supported employment among veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder

Authors: 
Diclementi, J. D., Ross, M. K., Mallo, C., & Johnson, S.
Year Published: 
2012
Publication: 
Psychiatric Services in Advance
Volume: 
63
Number: 
5
Pages: 
464-470
Publisher: 
American Psychiatric Association
Background: 

Post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a potentially disabling mental illness that can cause occupational dysfunction. Although vocational rehabilitation is often prescribed for patients with PTSD, standard vocational services are far from adequate in helping them obtain and maintain competitive employment.

Purpose: 

This study is the first to examine the outcome of evidence-based supported employment for veterans with PTSD. Study addressed this gap in the field of rehabilitation research.

Setting: 

The setting for the study was the Tuscaloosa Veterans Administration Medical Center.

Sample: 

Veterans were eligible for the study if they had a diagnosis of PTSD, wee aged 19-60, were eligible for the VAMC Vocational Rehabilitation Program, were currently unemployed, were interested in competitive employment, and were planning to remain in a 100 mile radius of the Tuscaloosa VAMC for the 12-month duration.

Data Collection: 

Using intent to treat analyses and two tailed tests with significance set at p less than or equal to .05, researchers compared rates of competitive employment, as well as number of weeks , day and hours worked; gross wages earned from all sources; and gross wages earned from competitive jobs.

Intervention: 

Unemployed veterans with PTSD were randomly assigned to either individual placement and support (IPS) supported employment (N = 42) or a Veterans Health Administration Vocational Rehabilitation Program (VRP) treatment as usual (N = 43). Employment rates and occupational outcomes were followed for 12 months. IPS intervention involved several important features. For example, the IPS specialist was integrated into the clinical mental health or PTSD treatment team, carried out all phases of the vocational services, provided predominantly community based employment, had a caseload of no more than 25 clients, and provided continuous time unlimited follow along supports for vocational services.

Control: 

The VRP followed the standard care in place at the VMC, which included one or more of these components: routine prevocational testing and evaluation for all patients on referral to VRP, vocational rehabilitation therapy and provided a work regimen with monetary incentives, and a transitional work program that included a temporary work experience.

Findings: 

During the 12-month study, 76% of the IPS participants gained competitive employment, compared with 28% of the VRP participants (number needed to treat = 2.07; ?(2) = 19.84, df = 1, p<.001). Veterans assigned to IPS also worked substantially more weeks than those assigned to VRP (42% versus 16% of the eligible weeks, respectively; Mann-Whitney z test p<.001) and earned higher 12-month income (mean ± SD income of $9,264 ± $13,294 for IPS versus $2,601 ± $6,009 for VRP; Mann-Whitney z test p<.001) during the 12-month period.

Conclusions: 

Veterans with PTSD who received IPS were 2.7 times more likely to gain competitive employment than those who received VRP. Because work is central to recovery, these results should assist stakeholders in planning improved services for veterans with PTSD.

URL: 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22307881
Disabilities: 
NIDILRR Funded: 
Peer Reviewed: 
Yes

Effectiveness of vocational problem-solving skills on motivation and job-seeking action steps

Authors: 
Coviello, D. M., Zanis, D. A., Wesnosik, S. A., & Domis, S. W.
Year Published: 
2004
Publication: 
Substance Use and Misuse
Volume: 
39
Number: 
13
Pages: 
2309-2324
Publisher: 
Informa Healthcare
Background: 

In a previous study, a Vocational Problem Solving Skills (VPSS) intervention was not a significant independent predictor of employment, but other factors such as length of previous work experience, age, and baseline motivation level (described in methods) were significant. In this follow up study the examiners took a look at the potential impact of the VPSS intervention on motivation and intermediary job seeking activities.

Purpose: 

This study examined the impact of a vocational problem solving skills (VPSS) intervention to increase motivation and action step activities that lead to employment for methadone maintained treatment clients. The hypothesis were as follows: those who receive the VPSS intervention will develop greater motivation to work than those in the control condition; the VPSS group will participate in more job-seeking activities compared with the control group; motivation to work during the intervention period will predict employment at the 6-month follow-up; and job-seeking activities during the intervention will also predict 6-month employment outcomes.

Setting: 

The study took place at two community-based methadone treatment centers.

Sample: 

Sixty two subjects were randomized to the VPSS condition and 47 were randomized to the time and attention control condition. The average age of participants was 44 and the majority (61%) were black and (60%) male. Sixty-one percent had a high school diploma/GED and two-thirds reported a marketable skill or trade. The overwhelming majority or (92%) received some form of public welfare.

For those who reported receiving employment income it was reported as off the books and consisted of day work of fewer than 10 h per week. There were no significant differences between the VPSS and control conditions on any of the baseline measures.

Data Collection: 

Data was collected using the Addiction Severity Index (ASI) and a Vocational Motivational Assessment Checklist (VMAC). The VMAC measures the behavioral actions to obtain employment and a person's perceived motivation to obtain a job. Both were administered to get baseline and 6 months later. The VMAC was also completed on a biweekly basis over the 12-week intervention period.

Intervention: 

The intervention related to Vocational Problem Solving Skills (VPSS) consisting of 10 counseling and educational sessions designed to (1) help clients understand why they want to work, (2) help clients understand how to overcome personal employment barriers, (3) set realistic employment goals, (4) identify internal and external resources to locate employment opportunities, and (5) take appropriate actions to secure employment. Fourteen methadone treatment counselors from two methadone treatment programs (MMTPs) were trained in the cognitive problem solving intervention. Afterwards they participated in weekly sessions to ensure continued adherence to the delivery of
the VPSS intervention. The control condition consisted of a similar cognitively based intervention aimed at drug use. The same 14 counselors delivered the intervention to both VPSS and control clients.

Control: 

Participants had random assignment to either the treatment or control group.

Findings: 

The study revealed that there were no differences by condition in the level of motivation to secure employment and the number of job seeking activities. Whereas, the motivation to work and number of action steps did predict gaining employment for the entire sample.

Conclusions: 

The intervention did not increase motivation and job seeking activities.

URL: 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15603006
NIDILRR Funded: 
Peer Reviewed: 
Yes

Results of a multisite randomized trial of supported employment interventions for individuals with severe mental illness

Authors: 
Cook, J. A., Lehman, A. F., Drake, R., McFarlane, W. R., Gold, P. B., Leff, H. S., ... & Grey, D. D.
Year Published: 
2005
Publication: 
Archives of General Psychiatry
Volume: 
62
Number: 
5
Pages: 
505-512
Publisher: 
American Medical Association
Background: 

The majority of people with chronic mental illness are unemployed. Research shows that a supported employment (SE) model approach to vocational rehabilitation for people with chronic mental illness establishes SE as an evidence-based practice and more effective than "services as usual or unenhanced services" (p. 505).

Purpose: 

This study tested three hypotheses:
1. The experimental group receiving SE services would be better able to to achieve competitive employment than those in the comparison group (work 40 or more hours per month and higher monthly earnings).
2. Differences between experimental and control groups would increase over time
3. experimental group would achieve greater outcomes regardless of demographics and receipt of disability income

Setting: 

Eight study sites were located in Maryland, Connecticut, South Carolina, Pennsylvania, Arizona, Massachusetts, Maine, and Texas.

Sample: 

People "with severe and persistent mental illness receiving outpatient psychiatric services" (p. 506). Additional requirements included:
- 18 years old
- willing and able to provide informed consent
- unemployed at time of entry into the study

The criteria for "severe and persistent mental illness based on diagnosis, duration, and level of disability as established by the federal Center for Mental Health Services" were met (p. 506). The total number of participants was 1648, and 1273 were included in the study analysis.

Data Collection: 

Data were collected at intake and every 6 months for the entire 24-month period using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. In addition, two sites used the DSM-IV at study enrollment, while other sites extracted information from clinical records.

Public disability income beneficiary status was monitored bi-annually, as well as "self-rated level of functioning, marital status, and educational attainment" (p. 507). Sites also collected labor force data, such as weekly earnings and hours worked, job duties, eligibility for health and sick leave benefits, and level of integration in the workplace. Sites reported on amount of vocational and psychiatric services received each month.

Intervention: 

Supported employment interventions were offered, which consisted of:
1. integrated services by "a multidisciplinary team that met 3 or more times per week to plan and coordinate employment interventions with case management and psychiatric
treatment" (p. 506)
2. Clients were placed in competitive jobs, which paid at least minimum wage, and were socially integrated (not set aside for people with disabilities)
3. Jobs were developed based on client preferences
4. Job search began as soon as client entered program and moved as rapidly as the client wanted
5. Ongoing vocational supports were readily available throughout the study period (supports did not fade once employment was obtained)

Several sites developed additional interventions, including the Individual Placement and Support model, the Program of Assertive Community Treatment vocational model, as well as services designed to "enrich clients' natural supports" (p. 507).

Control: 

Four sites maintained services as usual; 2 sites used a "weaker version" of the experimental condition; and one site compared two pre-existing vocational models.

Findings: 

The experimental groups achieved competitive employment (55%), worked 40 hours or more per month (51%), and had significantly higher earnings ($122/month) than the control groups (34%, 39%, and $99/month, respectively). These outcomes increased significantly over time.

Conclusions: 

The experimental programs yielded higher and more positive effects than "services as usual" (p. 510). This advantage increased over time.

URL: 
http://www.worksupport.com/kter/documents/pdf/ResultsofMultisiteRandomziedTrial.pdf
Disabilities: 
NIDILRR Funded: 
Peer Reviewed: 
Yes

The Employment Intervention Demonstration program: Major findings and policy implications

Authors: 
Cook, J. A., Leff, H. S., Blyler, C. R., Gold, P. B., Goldberg, R. W., Mueser, K. T., Toprac, M. G., McFarlane, W. R., Shafer, M. S., Blankertz, L. E., Dudek, K., Razzano, L. A., Grey, D. D., & Burke-Miller, J.
Year Published: 
2008
Publication: 
Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal
Volume: 
31
Number: 
4
Pages: 
291-295
Publisher: 
American Psychological Association
Background: 

The Employment Intervention Demonstration program was a "multi-center study designed to generate knowledge about effective approaches for enhancing employment among adults with severe mental illnesses" (p. 291).

Purpose: 

This article describes the study design, models tested, and study participants.

Setting: 

This study is a systematic review. The included studies were undertaken in various locations and settings.

Sample: 

The study participants included 1273 people with chronic mental illness at seven sites.

Data Collection: 

This article summarizes findings of published articles about EIDP. "For pre-existing models, fidelity was assessed via established measures; the EIDP also developed and administered a cross-site measure of adherence to supported employment principles and practices" (p. 292).

Intervention: 

Supported employment programs were implemented and followed for two years.

Control: 

Control groups received services as usual.

Findings: 

Supported employment models were more effective than services as usual. In addition, Experimental condition subjects were
more likely to be competitively employed (55% of experimental versus 34% of control participants), work 40 or more hours per month (51% versus 39%), and have higher earnings ($i22/month vs. $99/month) despite controlling for demographic, clinical, and work history confounds. And, the advantage that the experimental group clients had over the comparison group increased over time.

Conclusions: 

Supported employment models are effective and their value increases over time, indicating that the effects achieved are sustainable. These models work in diverse settings, different geographical areas, and for a variety of clients.

URL: 
http://www.worksupport.com/kter/documents/pdf/EIDPMajorFindingsandPolicyImplications.pdf
Disabilities: 
NIDILRR Funded: 
Peer Reviewed: 
Yes