The Employment Intervention Demonstration program: Major findings and policy implications
|Authors:||Cook, J. A., Leff, H. S., Blyler, C. R., Gold, P. B., Goldberg, R. W., Mueser, K. T., Toprac, M. G., McFarlane, W. R., Shafer, M. S., Blankertz, L. E., Dudek, K., Razzano, L. A., Grey, D. D., & Burke-Miller, J.|
|Publication||Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal|
|Publisher||American Psychological Association|
The Employment Intervention Demonstration program was a "multi-center study designed to generate knowledge about effective approaches for enhancing employment among adults with severe mental illnesses" (p. 291).
This article describes the study design, models tested, and study participants.
This study is a systematic review. The included studies were undertaken in various locations and settings.
The study participants included 1273 people with chronic mental illness at seven sites.
This article summarizes findings of published articles about EIDP. "For pre-existing models, fidelity was assessed via established measures; the EIDP also developed and administered a cross-site measure of adherence to supported employment principles and practices" (p. 292).
Control groups received services as usual.
Supported employment models were more effective than services as usual. In addition, Experimental condition subjects were
Supported employment models are effective and their value increases over time, indicating that the effects achieved are sustainable. These models work in diverse settings, different geographical areas, and for a variety of clients.
|Populations||Hispanic or Latino | Black / African American | White / Caucasian | Male & Female|
|Research Design||Systematic reviews and meta-analysis|