The Hartford study of supported employment for persons with severe mental illness
|Authors:||Murphy, L., Chamberlain, E., Weir, J., Berry, A., James, D. N., & Agnew, R.|
|Publication||Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology|
|Publisher||American Psychological Association|
High rates of unemployment persist with people with psychiatric disorders despite their desire to work. Moderate evidence suggests that people with psychiatric disorders who do work experience "modest benefits in terms of symptoms and life satisfaction" (p. 479).
Three approaches to vocational rehabilitation were compared for people with psychiatric disorders. This included the Individualized Placement and Support Model(IPS), a psychosocial rehabilitation program (PSR), and standard services.
The setting included community mental health center in Hartford, Connecticut. The psychosocial rehabilitation program was located off-site. Standard services were offered off-site.
One hundred ninety-eight clients consented to participate (out of 258 who were asked): 86% were Latino(n = 64 consents/74 total), 81% were African-American (n = 91 consented/119 total), and 66% were White (n=43 consented/65 total).
Several assessments were used: diagnosis,
Job satisfaction was rated by the Indiana Job Satisfaction Scale. PANSS was used for nonvocational outcomes and modified to be entirely client self-report.
Overall functioning was rated by the Global Assessment Scale, while social and leisure functioning was rated using one subscale from the Social Adjustment Scale-II: Social-Leisure subscale, as well as a global rating.
Social network information was rated with a variant of the Social Support and Social Network Interview and was requested at baseline, 12 months and 24 months. Quality of Life was assessed through the Brief Version of Quality of Life Interview. Substance abuse was also tracked using the Alcohol Use Scale and Drug Use Scale.
Statistical analyses were conducted as follows:
Standard services that are considered typical of most supported employment services, which included access to all other vocational services available to everyone with severe mental illness, vocational program with substandard wages, or competitive wages under contracts negotiated by the program. Two programs were evaluated: standard-supported and standard-enclave.
Fidelity to the IPS model (for each of the programs) was evaluated using the IPS Fidelity Scale. The programs were rated in order from highest to lowest: IPS, standard-supported, PSR, and standard-enclave.
The Individual Placement and Support model was the most effective at retaining clients and improving employment outcomes.
|Populations||Male & Female | Hispanic or Latino | Black / African American | White / Caucasian|
|Research Design||Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs)|