White / Caucasian

Assistive technology can help individuals with SCI to compensate for functional limitations, overcome barriers to employability, enhance technical capacities and computer use, and improve ability to compete for employment.

This 2-year extension of an experimental study of supported employment showed persistence of the experimental effects on competitive employment. Overall, clients experienced no significant deterioration in amount of competitive employment, despite the fact that only 60% continued to receive vocational services. This finding is in contrast to that found in earlier studies of supported employment although it is consistent with the persistence found by Bond and colleagues.
Moreover, differences between the original experimental groups that emerged during the 18-month experimental phase persisted throughout the 2-year extension phase with only moderate attenuation. The evidence indicates a continuation of the momentum gained during the experimental phase of the study despite minimal continued vocational supports overall. This finding was also contrary to expectations, as earlier studies have often found a decrease in group differences following the termination of a formal intervention. The results also showed that receiving services during the extension phase was related to amount of employment for clients in the original IPS group. More than half of the IPS clients received IPS-like services during the extension phase, and together with those few who received other services, they were more than twice as likely to work than clients who received no services.

Predictors of clients' work outcomes included previous work history, amount of government entitlement income received, severity of negative symptoms, involvement in sheltered work activity at baseline, and level of cognitive functioning, including scores on measures of executive functioning and verbal learning and memory. The amounts of on-job support and contact with employment specialists were predicted by the cognitive domains of executive functioning, verbal learning, attention, and psychomotor speed as well as by the severity of psychotic symptoms.

Patients in the supported employment with cognitive training program demonstrated significantly greater improvements at 3 months in cognitive functioning, depression, and autistic preoccupation. Over 2–3 years, patients in the supported employment with cognitive training program were more likely to work, held more jobs, worked more weeks, worked more hours, and earned more wages than patients in the program offering supported employment alone.

The rate of retention of the cognitive training program was high. The program was successfully implemented at two sites that predominantly served inner city minorities. Participant who received cognitive training showed improvements in several areas over the first 3 months of the study as well as a better overall cognitive functioning score as compared to those who received only supported employment services. They also had higher rates of employment. Notably, this group showed improvements on the PANSS depression scale.

At six months, patients with appropriate care, compared to those without it, had lower rates of depressive disorder (24 percent versus 70 percent), better mental health-related quality of life, and higher rates of employment (72 percent versus 53 percent), each p<.05.

The three women preferred enclave work over the workshop setting. The participants indicating satisfaction with work assignments and relationships with others in the enclave. Policies and regulations like social security, impacted quality of life.

Of the 235 enrolled participants, 172 completed at least one follow-up. Of this group, 90 were in some form of work at baseline, but 46 stopped working at some time later in the study and their time to return to work was reset to start at the time that they stopped working. Participants in the intervention condition were more likely to return to work than those in the comparison group. In addition, men, those in relatively poor health, those receiving either Social Security or state disability income and those with higher incomes at baseline were less likely to return to work.

The CHAID data mining analysis revealed that job placement services, work disincentives, and case expenditures as the most important predictors of employment outcomes. In addition, physical restoration, substantial counseling, and assistive technology services all led to positive employment outcomes. Importantly, the CHAID analysis segmented the sample into 45 mutually exclusive homogeneous end groups, with a wide range of employment outcomes. The CHAID analysis indicated that demographic variables interacted with rehabilitation services to affect employment outcomes.

he MVCCS evaluated in this study appeared to substantially improve employment outcome for persons with BI without interventions. Results were better than projections based on the previous literature 80% of those served were placed in community-based work with 46% in independent community-based employment. Employment outcomes for persons who received vocational services through this project approached or exceeded outcomes reported previously for intensive rehabilitation interventions. Just as importantly, initial vocational placements were maintained at 1-year follow-up. At the follow-up interview, 81% were working in the community and 53% were employed independently without job supports. Although the results were equivalent to those of other rehabilitation programs that are based on best practices the authors could not make direct comparisons with those programs because we did not investigate specific interventions. Primary predictors of initial placement in the present study were time since injury and overall impairment/disability as measured by the Staff MPAI. Return to previous work should be considered especially for the more recently injured who have retained ties to their previous employer. Results indicate that more severe impairments and disabilities, as measured by the MPAI, are significant barriers to employment in the general population of persons with BI. However, for persons with TBI, the presence of additional non-brain injuries appears to be a more important factor.

The best predictor of employment level at 1-year follow-up was the level of initial placement. ISA (as measured by the difference between Rasch Staff MPAI and Rasch Survivor MPAI) did not contribute to the prediction of either initial placement or job maintenance. This finding is inconsistent with some other studies reporting an association between ISA and long-term employment after BI. The results suggest that ISA may be a barrier to employment that can be overcome through rehabilitation, through education and support for employers, and by discriminating placement of those persons with ISA in work environments that are more tolerant of limitations in self-awareness. Overall level of impairment and disability also appears to be a factor in time required for placement. In some cases, more intensive rehabilitation efforts, such as a CI day rehabilitation program, were required for more severely disabled persons so they could develop cognitive compensation, communication, behavioral self-management, social, and other pre-vocational skills required for eventual placement. Because of the time required for participation in such an intensive rehabilitation program, most individuals who participated in CI day rehabilitation required 6 to 12 months from the time they were admitted to services to their eventual placement. Our data suggest that most placements (92%) can be made within 1 year of admission to services. Preinjury years of education also contributed slightly to prediction of time to placement, with more highly educated individuals being placed more quickly.